Thursday, November 11, 2010

Endosulfan - Who Is the Real Culprit in Kerala?

This heart rending image of a deformed girl from Kasargod district in Kerala, India brings to our notice the stark realities of indiscriminate and excess use of hazardous pesticides without the least concern for the well being of people inhabiting near the plantations. Northern Kerala is particularly suited for the cashew crop, which was introduced in India by the Portuguese in 16th century from Brazil. Since the climate is ideally suited for the crop, it has struck deep roots in the Kerala soil and has become as much a Kerala crop as pepper. This small state on the western coast of India is notorious for its communist ideals which are still advocated fiercely, often with physical force by its adherents. No wonder, most of the large industries in Kerala are state-owned and managed (most often) by illiterate and corrupt politicians, but that’s another story. The Plantation Corporation of Kerala is a state-owned enterprise in the agricultural sector, whose sole job is to produce rubber, cashew, oil palm and such crops and sell the products. In 1976, the corporation decided to employ Endosulfan in its cashew estate on the hills nearby Padre village in Kasargod district of Kerala. Like how they did in their rubber plantations, the corporation used the new, and highly toxic pesticide using helicopters. The villagers of Padre draw water from four streams, Kodenkeri thodu, Swarga, Pathadka and Badiyaru which run through the plantation. Naturally, the water became toxic and the unsuspecting public drank it leading to severe health, neurologic and reproductive complications, with the image of the child being a minor one of them. We’ll find more serious deformations and diseases among the other members of the village.

Several studies have documented that endosulfan can affect human development. Researchers studying children from Padre have linked endosulfan exposure to delays in sexual maturity among boys. The researchers compared the villagers to a control group of boys from a demographically similar village that lacked a history of endosulfan pollution. Relative to the control group, the exposed boys had high levels of endosulfan in their bodies, lower levels of testosterone, and delays in reaching sexual maturity. Birth defects of the male reproductive system including cryptorchidism (the absence of one or both testes from the scrotum) were also more prevalent in the study group. The researchers concluded that "our study results suggest that endosulfan exposure in male children may delay sexual maturity and interfere with sex hormone synthesis."

Endosulfan (chemical name - hexachlorocyclopentadiene) is a highly effective pesticide, developed in 1954 by Hoechst AG, now Bayer CropScience. Current annual world production is 12,800 tons, out of which 8,500 tons are produced in India by three players, Excel Crop Care, Coromandal Fertilizers and the state-owned Hindustan Insecticides. 4,500 tons are for domestic use and 4,000 tons are exported from India. It is no wonder why the government of India strongly resisted attempts in international fora to include the pesticide under the Stockholm protocol which attempts to restrict the use of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP). With more than two-thirds of the world production at home, who would let that money go? Moreover, one among the three companies is a state-owned one with all profits going to the government alone.

The Plantation Corporation has long since stopped aerial spraying of Endosulfan. The last such application of pesticide was in 1991. Since it is clear that the hundreds of people who had lost the reason for existence and have become preys of a chemical disaster which could be compared to the tragedy at Bhopal in 1984, are the victims of an industrial disaster, they must be compensated accordingly. Nothing can bring their happiness and well being back - those are irretrievably lost – but still, an enlightened society have what are available to them to give to those poor wretches, money and medical care.

So what is the solution to ensure that such incidents don’t happen in future? Is it the ban on Endosulfan? Absolutely not, by any means! Any chemical, with pesticides in particular are highly toxic and should be handled with utmost care. In this present case, the indiscriminate aerial spraying was the culprit and the company which did it must pay dearly for the lives it has devastated. Surprisingly, the Plantation Corporation has managed to go scotfree by giving a pittance because it is a state-owned enterprise! The communists, who are ruling Kerala at the moment is spearheading a campaign to ban endosulfan, like the chemical was the culprit. The people who hold Doe Chemicals which acquired Union Carbide after the Bhopal tragedy responsible for the gas disaster are mum on the role of Plantation Corporation of Kerala. Being a state-owned company, does it confer the right to mercilessly extinguish the light in the lives of people? And why ban Endosulfan, when the real criminals escaped and are running agitations against the chemical? If a car kills a person in an accident, who is responsible, the car driver or the company which manufactured the car? Such simple logic is lost on those who go out like herds following a long since discarded political system in the world.

When Monsanto came out with Bt Brinjal, which claimed that pesticides were not required for the crop (Endosulfan is the most widely used pesticide for brinjal cultivation), these same people opposed that too! They seem to have gone blind with the outdated political philosophy they seek to propagate. Kerala seems to have no wayout from this political quagmire, as all the political parties here are centre-left, with almost similar ideologies and action plans.

Friday, November 5, 2010

A Bad Day for Airbus A380





 The damaged engine of Qantas flight in Singapore





A Qantas A380 Super Jumbo Jet flying from Singapore to Sydney developed engine problems 15 minutes into the flight, while flying over Indonesia's Batam Island yesterday, Nov 4th, 2010. The engine nearest to the fuselage developed serious problems and exploded, ejecting a portion of the cowl midair which fell on a residential area down below. Even though the plane could operate with the remaining three engines, the pilot decided to go back to Singapore's Changi Airport as a safety measure. After the plane touched down in Singapore, the engine closest to the fuselage on the left wing had visible burn marks and was missing a section of plate that would have been painted with the red kangaroo logo of the airline. The upper part of the left wing also appeared to have suffered some damage. No one among the 440 passengers and 26 crew suffered any injury. The issue gathered so much international attention mostly because the plane was A380 which is the latest wide-bodied passenger jet. Just an year back, on Sep 29, 2009 a A380 of Singapore Airlines flying from Paris to Singapore developed a fault on one engine after two-and-a-half hours into the flight forcing a return to Paris.

Qantas has landed its entire fleet of six A380s pending detailed enquiry. This is a significant number, as there are only 37 planes of this class operating worldwide. The A380 comes with a choice of engine by the client, with the options being Trent 900 of Rolls Royce and GP7200 of General Electric - Pratt & Whitney joint venture company, with most of the customers opting for Rolls Royce. A similar engine, the Trent 1000 which was being tested on Boeing's DreamLiner 787 jet exploded earlier this year, raising fears about the airworthiness of the superbly modern and technically advanced Trent series engines. Rolls Royce need to address these issues in right earnest and allay the fears. The Federal Aviation Administration in the U.S. has declared that it could announce restrictions on flying A380 if Airbus can't allay fears on its turbines. The bad press for its star model is spelling trouble for the beleaguered European aircraft manufacturer, owing to the huge developmental cost of this doubledecker aircraft, which has run into 12 billion Euros (Rs. 75,000 crores!). The order book is also not scintillating by any means. The total orders fell from 85 in 2001 to just 4 in 2009, though it has jumped to 32 in 2010, all of them from Emirates Airlines. The sale is dismal in USA and Japan, probably due to severe pressure from Boeing.





 A380 makes its debut landing at Hong Kong






With a take off weight of 544 tons and a wing area of 845 sq.m, this engineering marvel can carry 853 passengers in its all economy class (or 525 persons in three-class structure) double decker fuselage powered by four engines. Its cabin has an area of 478.1 sq.m, 49% more space than the next largest airliner, Boeing's 747-400. Its design range is 15,200 km and a maximum cruising speed of 900 kmph (Mach 0.85). It will be disheartening to all people rooting for human progress in the skies. More than Airbus or Rolls Royce (whose share prices dipped due to the incident), any setback on the flights of these dream jet would be a blow to global engineering itself. This does not mean that we should push the issues under the carpet. On the contrary, all safety issues should be promptly sorted out and the airliner be put in service without any hitch. Any knee-jerk reaction, like Qantas' grounding all its A380 fleet would help only to spread panic which is unwarranted. Let reason prevail!